Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 10:42
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Making a Diving Catch For Space - NASA Watch
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Google’s NotebookLM now lets you share your notebook — and AI podcasts — publicly - The Verge
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Could Patriots cut Stefon Diggs and owe him nothing? It’s complicated. - NBC Sports
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Power Rankings: RBC Canadian Open - PGA Tour
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
M’s Kirby struck in face by 103 mph line drive - Seattle Sports
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the most gay experience with your dad?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The Louvre, the world’s most-visited museum, shuts down to sound the alarm on mass tourism - PBS
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.